[« God (if she exists) save us from the wrath of Wolcott!] [A first blog post? »]
07/11/2005: A distinction without a difference?
Josh Marshall had an interesting comment about Karl Rove's crime (or negligence) last night:
So we've got Karl Rove's latest story, as recounted by his lawyer, Robert Luskin.
Rove did spill the beans about Plame in an effort to discredit Joe Wilson. Only he didn't mention the name 'Valerie Plame'. He only spilled the beans about 'Joe Wilson's wife'.
I'm no lawyer. But I'd hate to go into court with my case resting on that distinction.
And remember, the president has certainly known all of this from the beginning.
Len on 07.11.05 @ 12:51 PM CST
