[« Yuk o'the Day:] [Here's a much more deserving candidate for that medal.... »]
12/16/2004: Well, why should Bush hold himself accountable...
when we the people failed to do so on November 2? From Richard Brooks (on the award of the Presidential Medal of Freedom to L. Paul Bremer, Tommy Franks, and George Tenet):
The White House medal ceremony was really about George W. Bush. It had a slight touch of the absurd to it, as if facts do not matter and failure does not count. The War to Rid Iraq of WMD has now become The War to Bring Democracy to the Middle East. No one is ever held accountable, because the president will not do as much for himself. He admits no mistakes because he is convinced that he has made none. The terrorist attacks themselves, for which Tenet should have been sacked, are no one's fault because they cannot be the president's fault. He was warned. Condi Rice was put on notice. But, still, who could have known?
To make these awards in the face of failure -- the mounting American death toll, the awful suffering of the Iraqis, the looming possibility of civil war, the nose-thumbing of the still-at-large Osama bin Laden and the madness of making war for a nonexistent reason -- has the creepy feel of the old communist states, where incompetents wore medals and harsh facts were denied.
Len on 12.16.04 @ 12:05 PM CST
